This week, Octomom Nadya Suleman has been blasted for having 13 of her 14 kids “enrolled in a private education,” and paying as much as $6,000 a year per child for school. “She doesn’t even think about the future,” says a source. Sounds extravagant, no?
Well, yes and no.
Private school is a privilege that is out of reach for most families, right? I mean, in some circles it’s the very definition of exclusivity. Private school! How rich are you?
However, in this case, most of the Suleman kids – the octuplets – are two and a half years old, which means that if they’re in school at all, they’re in preschool. Except for Head Start, which has pretty low income requirements, there is really no such thing as public preschool in California, where they live. (Los Angeles County actually has some, but not many.) Which means that any school the octuplets would attend would almost necessarily be private. And $500/month for preschool is a freakin’ steal.
As for the other five children who are in private school – Suleman’s rep tells the Huffington Post that the oldest child has always attended public school – at $3,500/month, it probably is a luxury she can’t afford, especially if it’s true that she can’t pay her mortgage. Even when you consider the discounts she’s probably receiving as well as any scholarships she might qualify for, if she can’t afford to pay for housing, she can’t afford a private education for the older kids, who can presumably attend public school for free. (Suleman’s rep has said that she’s recently pulled the octuplets out of preschool in an effort to save money, so she is at least trying to reduce her expenses.)
Now don’t get me wrong. I’m certainly no Octomom apologist. I think she’s got some serious issues, and I don’t believe her whole “I was drugged” story. But I do have to take issue with comments like this one:
“Nadya thinks that by shoving her kids in school, it will free her up and give her time to make money doing something.”
In most circles, that’s called, you know, working. Which is what responsible parents do, and unless you’re lucky enough to have a family member who can provide free childcare, or rich enough to afford a nanny, working means using daycare/preschool. I mean, the woman might be a little nuts, but in the end, she’s a single mom with a ridiculous number of kids. If she needs to access daycare so she can work, that’s no crime. I would argue that it isn’t even worthy of mention. In this instance at least, I say give Octomom a break.
Photo: WENN.com













